Download in Citation Manager - Print - Email - PakMediNet Member Services

Submit your Research Synopsis for Free Expert analysis - Search- Feedback - Drug Index


In the methods section, authors forgot to mention whether and how did they evaluate correlations. Also in table 3, authors give t-values and and p-values. Quite interestingly, a t-value of 9.96 was given a p-value of 0.59. I am unable to understand it, may be someone can help me. And this is not just one p-value, there are many such errors in the table. Now, either t-values are incorrect or p-values are incorrect. Surprisingly, how did such an obvious error escaped the review and editorial process.
Posted by: rqayyum on Aug 2005


Your USERNAME (login)
Your Comments

Journal Index - Authors Index - Keywords Index - Research Synopsis - PakMediNet Drug Index
About us - Terms and Conditions - Contributors - Contact Us - Member Services

© All rights reserved and Copyright protected
No Part of Website is allowed to be copied without prior permission. Hosted by PakCyber (R).