Tariq Saeed, Zarin M, Mahmud Aurangzeb, Aziz Wazir, Roohul Muqeem.
Comparative study of Laparoscopic versus open Cholecysyectomy.
Pak J Surg Jan ;23(2):96-9.

Objective: To compare our results of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Open Cholecystectomy regarding case selection, technical difficulties, duration of surgery, operative complications, post operative complications, post operative hospital stay, morbidity & mortality, patient`s attitude after operation, operative expenses, total expenses and general impression in the society. Design & Duration: Comparative study carried out from January 2002 to December 2005. Setting: Department of Surgery, Surgical “D” Ward, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar Patients: This study was conducted on two hundreds patients, one hundred patients were submitted to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and the other hundred to traditional Open Cholecystectomy. Methodology: These patients were admitted in our unit through Out-door department or in emergency as acute cholecystitis. All patients were thoroughly assessed and necessary investigations carried out. After informed consent all patients were operated on the next operation list. The patients were randomly assigned to either one of the procedures. Results: There was no significant difference in the selection of patients in the two groups. No mortality was seen in both the groups, but complications were more in the open procedure than the laparoscopic one. There is less pain, less hospitalization, early mobilization and early return to work in the laparoscopic surgery. Conclusion: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is a superior procedure in comparison to Open Cholecystectomy as regards to the results. Hence it is recommended as the first choice operation.

PakMediNet -Pakistan's largest Database of Pakistani Medical Journals - http://www.pakmedinet.com