Gulzar Ahmed Malik, Abdul Wahab, Imtiaz Ahmed.
Hemorrhoidectomy: open versus closed technique.
J Surg Pak Jan ;14(4):170-2.

Objective: To compare open haemorrhoidectomy technique with closed one in terms of wound healing time and complications. Study design: A comparative clinical trial. Place & duration of study: Department of Surgery Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur, from June 2006 to June 2008. Patients and Methods: Patients of 3rd and fourth degree haemorrhoid (n-60) were selected for this study. They were divided into two groups. Group A (n-30) was treated by open haemorrhoidectomy (Milligan Morgan technique) and group B (n-30) was treated by closed haemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson technique). Postoperatively patients were evaluated for wound healing time and complications. Results: The age of the patient ranged from 18 years to 73 years. The wound healing time was little over 2 weeks in group B while it was just above 4 ½ weeks in group A with p value of less than 0.05. After 24 hours the mean VAS in group A was 4.76± 1.4 while it was 3.93± 1.68 in group B and the p value was 0.046 which was significant The best results were obtained with closed haemorrhoidectomy technique as there was less post operative pain, rapid wound healing and less post operative bleeding with this approach. Conclusion: Closed haemorrhoidectomy is treatment of choice for 3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids.

PakMediNet -Pakistan's largest Database of Pakistani Medical Journals - http://www.pakmedinet.com